Why I Won’t Be Using My CPF To Pay For My House

For those of you who attended my sharing at the CPF Talk on 22 Oct, I mentioned that I have no intention to use my CPF to pay for my new house.

Naturally, this raised quite a few eyebrows, because 8 in 10 Singaporeans pay for their house using their CPF Ordinary Account (OA) savings.

But you heard me right.

What I feel my CPF is for

Now, before you go bat crazy on me, please hear me out first.

In my view, my CPF forms my “untouchable” pot of retirement gold. It is my social security net when I am old and too tired to work for an income.

When viewed as part of my entire financial portfolio, the CPF component contributes to the “bond” aspect – low risk with reasonably high interest rates.

With an interest rate of up to 3.5% per annum on my Ordinary Account savings, and up to 5% per annum on my Special Account and Medisave savings*,  I get to enjoy interest that no high-yield bank account can offer. You can jump through as many hoops as you can on those accounts, but you’re unlikely to even come close to 3.5% interest on your bank savings.

*Inclusive of an extra 1% interest paid on the first $60,000 of a member’s combined balances, of which up to $20,000 comes from your Ordinary Account (OA). Members aged 55 and above will also receive an additional 1% extra interest on the first $30,000 of their combined balances, with up to $20,000 from your OA.

If I were to use my CPF OA to pay for my home today, I am basically borrowing from my retirement funds for today’s expenses. That potentially leaves me with lesser money for my future.

In fact, if I do use my CPF OA, I will then owe my retirement fund that capital (the amount I had withdrawn to pay for my house i.e. principal sum) AND accrued interest.

Accrued interest is the interest my CPF savings would have earned if I did not withdraw it.

You can love or hate the CPF accrued interest (I’m with the former), but its function remains the same: to grow your CPF monies for your retirement. If you withdraw from it today, you have to make sure you are more diligent in saving up for your retirement beyond what you currently have in your CPF.

In short, the more CPF monies you use for your house today, the less you leave for your retirement.

Why I feel using cash to pay is better

Some Singaporeans, especially young married couples fresh out of university, may have no choice but to turn to their CPF in order to finance their monthly mortgage because cash isn’t an option at hand.

My husband and I aren’t cash-rich, but we’ve been diligently cutting our discretionary expenses and saving over the past two years to ensure we’ll have enough money to pay for our home…without needing to dip into our CPF reserves.

You see, if I were to leave my CPF-OA untouched, my money can grow by 2.5% every year. Compound this over 40 years and that accumulates into a tidy sum.

Who should use CPF instead of cash then?

However, some prefer to have more liquidity (i.e. cash) on hand for emergencies. If so, using CPF instead of cash to finance their house would be a better option.
The caveat, however, is that you have to be disciplined and set aside your own retirement fund.
Should I refinance or pay off my home loan using CPF-OA now?

If you already have an outstanding home loan, a common question most Singaporeans ask themselves is whether they should quickly clear off their housing debt using their CPF-OA (and celebrate being debt-free) OR refinance their home loan instead.
What’s the difference, and which is the smarter choice?
I personally would prefer to opt for refinancing, because all I would need to do is to find a bank loan^ with an interest rate lower than 2.5% (which is the CPF-OA’s interest rate).
In other words, you could either:

       Pay the bank 1.85% interest while earning 2.5% in your CPF-OA, or
       Pay (your own) CPF 2.5% interest

Option 1
Refinance with bank loan
Option 2
Pay off full outstanding sum
using CPF OA
Interest paid in first year
$250,000 x 1.85% = $4,625
$250,000 x 2.5% = $6,250
(This is the accrued interest that your CPF savings would have earned for your retirement.)
Interest gain or accrued in CPF in first year
$250,000 x 2.5% = $6,250
$0
Nett loss / gain
+ $1,625
         – $6,250        

The bottom line is, as long as you can get a bank loan where the interest rate is less than the CPF-OA interest rate, it makes more sense to refinance and pay your bank loan using cash instead. There are plenty of such loans available, and
if you need to understand more on how home loans work, I’ve previously written about it here.
Furthermore, your nett gain of 0.65% is then compounded over time (2.5% minus 1.85%).
^ Just note that bank loans are subject to market fluctuations. On the other hand, HDB loans will always be pegged at 0.10% above the prevailing CPF Ordinary Account (OA) interest rate.

Conclusion

There is nothing wrong with using CPF to pay for your house, because for some it’s the only option. But in my opinion, with careful planning, cash is still the smarter option.
This is also because I personally see my CPF as my retirement fund, something to grow instead of withdraw from.
But if you still choose to use your CPF, just remember that you have to pay the principal sum and accrued interest back to yourself. It is for your own retirement after all.
If you want to understand how your home can help with your retirement, here’s an interesting video by CPF that explains more:  


Disclaimer: This post is written in collaboration with CPF Board. All opinions are of my own. 
10 comments
  1. If a person know how to make more than 2.5% a year safely using cash, the person will not use want to use CPF to pay for the home.

  2. Nobody can predict the future when u need cash suddenly due to illness in family, jobless etc. Real experience will tell u that. It would be better to use cpf rather than cash. With the cash in hand, i can invest and the return is better than 2.5%. With cash in hand, i have the liquidity and safety. What if mid-career, u need a sum of $$ to set up your own business while juggling with family financial commitments.

  3. For sure! Savvy investors who are confident of generating high interest returns throughout both bull and bear market cycles could consider this option. In the case of my own investments, although I've definitely been netting higher returns, but there's still the chance that if a market crash were to come, all my funds could be wiped out. Hence, having the CPF in this case as my untouchable safety net to protect me gives me a very strong psychological guarantee that I still have another pot in place regardless of how the market fares!

  4. For sure! I think it's more of having your funds spread out in different pots and having that psychological guarantee of protecting myself lest I eat into my retirement funds though, should it be all kept in cash. This article shouldn't be viewed in isolation, I've been preaching about having emergency funds for such scenarios which you just described (and that should NOT be used for housing / nor completely in stock investments either, where one might be forced to liquidate at bad times). Ultimately, it is one's own choice as to whether they wish to use their CPF or cash, but in my case, I'd prefer to leave my CPF untouched for the reasons detailed in this post! 🙂

  5. Hi Dawn, do you know if it is possible to use cash fully for the 10% downpayment if I were to take up HDB loan? Just wondering if there are any constraints since so many people are clearing their entire CPF to pay for downpayment when they collect keys. Can you share your thoughts on this. Thanks:)

  6. Hi Dawn, is it possible to pay using CPF-OA, then top-up the annual loan repayment deductions in cash within the same year/month. Will this have any impact to the loan/CPF. IF we are allowed to do this, it still gives us a safety net if we lose our jobs, CPF is still paying the loan payments.

Comments are closed.

You May Also Like