Wednesday, 14 February 2018

Review: Standard Chartered's Unlimited Cashback Credit Card

How do you choose the best credit card for your lifestyle? Everyone has different spending habits, so the best credit card for you might not necessarily be the most suitable for me. As such, personalization is key.

With the growing popularity of cashback credit cards, many banks and card companies are now releasing extremely competitive cards. But with more choices come more headache as well, especially when each card comes with different cashback limits and spending requirements across various categories.

If you're looking for a cashback card with no caps and no hassled spending requirements, there are only 2 credit cards in the Singapore market which meet this criteria - Standard Chartered's Unlimited Cashback and the American Express True Cashback.

How do they stack up among each other?
There’s little difference in the benefits between both, except that the AMEX card may not be as readily accepted by some merchants.

For those of you who still haven't read the Cashback Guidebook 2018, here's a quick breakdown of how they compare against one another:


SCB Unlimited CashbackAMEX True Cashback
Cashback rate1.50%1.50%
Max. cashback capNoneNone
Min. annual income$30,000$30,000
Minimum spend (monthly)NoneNone
Best forFuss-freeFuss-free
Dining (weekend)1.50%1.50%
Dining (weekday)1.50%1.50%
Entertainment (weekend)1.50%1.50%
Entertainment (weekday)1.50%1.50%
Online shopping1.50%1.50%
Petrol Savings1.50%1.50%
Groceries1.50%1.50%
Toiletries1.50%1.50%
Transport1.50%1.50%
Telco1.50%1.50%
Hospital bills--
Utilities--

STANDARD CHARTERED UNLIMITED CASHBACK

Macintosh HD:private:var:folders:1d:h_675h291c9d8nk0x8y7jt3r0000gn:T:TemporaryItems:download.jpg


No cashback cap. No minimum spend.


There are only 2 credit cards in the market which do not have a cap on their maximum cashback, and the Standard Chartered Unlimited Cashback Card is one of them.


The 1.5% cashback rate is flat across all categories, so you don’t have to wreck your brains figuring out what or when to swipe your card in order to get a decent cashback rate.
If you're too busy (or lazy) to be fussed about cashback limits and requirements on the different spending habits, this is a good card for those preferring something with no requirements and caps.

For those keen to get this, I've partnered with SingSaver for an exclusive gift of $100 Takashimaya vouchers on top of the bank's welcome gift when you've successfully applied for the card. This promo is valid for BOTH new and existing customers!


With love,
Budget Babe

P.S. This is a post in collaboration with SingSaver, but all opinions are my own. I've also been promoting this card since 2017, together with the other cashback cards recommended in the Cashback Guidebook I published to kickstart 2018 with. Go have a read if you haven't already!


Friday, 9 February 2018

How do you value crypto?

One of the most common questions I get from readers (and skeptics) is how to value cryptocurrencies.

Traditional concepts and ratios like Price-to-Earnings, Free Cash Flow and Net Profit don't quite apply to cryptocurrencies, especially a large number of crypto projects still are in development and aren't ready for mass adoption in the real world yet.

So what's a crypto investor supposed to do?


We need to first understand that the crypto markets are still in their infancy. Unlike stocks (which have been around for a much longer time), there is still no universally accepted metric on how to value a crypto coin right now.

When Benjamin Graham introduced the concept of Margin of Safety, it took a few years before investors started accepting it and it became more widely used as a measurement to evaluating undervalued stocks. Similarly, we're still years away from such valuation metrics for crypto.


Contrast this to the rise of Internet stocks and companies back in the past as well - when companies like Amazon, Facebook and Google first broke on the scene, no one really knew how to conduct financial valuations on them either. Facebook and Google assets weren't physical, and Amazon was losing money and in the red for up till 2009. But we all know how their share prices have performed ever since.

Let's use Amazon as an example.

  • If you had used the traditional Price-to-Earning metric to value Amazon, you would have been alarmed at its negative P/E given Amazon's $5.78 million losses in 1996
  • Amazon returned no dividends to investors, nor did it do share buybacks

What would you have done? Probably stayed far away from this investment, because traditional valuation metrics were screaming red flags.


But today, with more Internet companies on the scene, we've become more familiar with growth investing and come up with other ways to value Internet companies at. Google's IPO in 2004 seems ridiculous when you consider the fact that it was asking for $23 billion when its prior revenue was only $1.5 billion, and it had no physical assets to speak of. Facebook had a rocky start to its IPO and how do you even measure the financial value of a "like", anyway? P/E ratios obviously didn't work for Facebook; it was barely making money out of its billion users until Facebook ads became a norm and revenue started pouring in.

You could have waited until then to invest, but wouldn't your returns have been infinitely more rewarding and explosive if you had bought Facebook right after listing, when valuations were still murky and uncertain?

Today, we know how to use cost-per-click (CPC) and click-through-rate (CPC) in our projections of future earnings when valuing Internet companies, but did we know that before when the Internet was still in its infancy? 



Even now, such valuations are more of an art than a science. Therefore similarly, we cannot expect to apply traditional knowledge and valuation models to crypto. They just don't work. My friend Aaron from Mr Stingy, also raised a very good point that the model you use will probably fall flat as well if the rest of the world isn't using it too.

But for those who insist on a numerical way to quantify exactly how much a coin is worth, there are still ways to be found. Let me illustrate with 2 examples.


Disclaimer: The below portion is purely for educational purposes, and is not a recommendation to buy any of the cryptocurrencies mentioned.

Kucoin Shares (KCS)
There are coins which can serve as a source of passive income (i.e. dividend-like investments). An example is KCS, which share a portion of its revenue from transaction fees earned through trades conducted on their exchange with its investors. There will also be buying demand for KCS as it offers discounts of up to 30% on trading fees. Hence, as Kucoin grows in popularity as an exchange, the value of KCS tokens will also go up. You could try to quantify how much it is worth by running daily trade transaction numbers, fees collected from trading, KCS buybacks, and more.

Someone even created a website for you to estimate how much your KCS tokens are worth.

Source: https://kucoinshares.com/

As more people use Kucoin, more trading fees will be collected, therefore the size of the payouts will increase over time. And because your dividends are paid in the form of alt coins, there is also a possibility that you'll be earning as their prices go up as well.

Assuming Kucoin grows to become the top 10 exchanges and handles slightly under $1 billion of daily trade volume, we could estimate:

$0.0007 per day x 365 days x 10 (growth in trading volume) x 4 (conservative estimate of growth of coins) = $10.22

If you hold 1000 KCS, that should give you $10,220 in passive income every year. Not too bad considering how 1000 KCS costs less than USD 6000 to purchase right now. Unfortunately, the Kucoin Shares scheme has been discontinued since last month.




OmiseGo (OMG)
Another example is OmiseGo. I previously shared a financial valuation model on my Facebook page where it examines various scenario, including the price of OMG tokens if it charges X% of transaction fees assuming that it is successful in taking over Y% of the e-commerce or remittance market. The spreadsheet was created by Nodar Janashia and shared online.

Even so, that doesn't mean this standard of valuing OMG tokens will be accepted by everyone. If your assumptions are way off, then your price estimations will also be problematic.
Source: Nodar Janashia

TLDR? 
In a nutshell, if you're looking for a universal method to value crypto tokens, there's none. Do not believe any investment course provider who claim that they can teach you a "reliable" method to put a price on the value of a coin, because there's no such standard in the global crypto markets.

Trying to put a price on what a particular crypto is worth is both an art and a science today. And I'll be the first to admit I don't always have all the answers - neither does anyone else. In fact, I don't usually quantify my crypto as much as I do for my stocks; instead, I look at qualitative metrics to assess if a crypto is worth my investment.

You've seen how I tore down Ripple (XRP) tokens previously because they failed to pass my qualitative criteria. You've also seen me do the same for LegitCoin and Bitconnect here.

I'll next share on crypto projects that DO make the cut for me, so stay tuned.



Just like how the Internet changed our lives forever, I think we're seeing the same with blockchain technology. And this is going to be one hell of a ride!


With love,
Budget Babe